.

Western Outlaw

January 24, 2011

Wikileaks Condom – Dickileaks by Condomania

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — Mal @ 9:00 pm

I knew it. It was only a matter of time before someone came up with a Julian Assange Condom, more specifically I thought it would either be coming from the prolific celebrity condom maker Benjamin Sherman (who’s been the father of the Obama Condom, the Palin Condom, the McCain Condom, the Tiger Woods Condom and finally the Oil Spill Condom), or Condomania who also have a history of using popular faces on condom wrappers.

Update: what do you think about such a thing? I’m not sure I like that money’s being made on the misery of others. but you might think otherwise.

Update II: we have another trending post you might want to have a look at: the YourTube condom.

And this morning I had a press release by Condomania sitting in my inbox presenting the “Dickileaks Condom, we Leak more than the Truth”.

Just a few days ago I published a post saying that Julian Assange had been falsely accused of rape in the western media and that actually the crime was more about not using a condom with the women he’d been during his time in Sweden.

Now here’s what Condomania has to say about the Dickileaks Condom:

When I read the headline that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was arrested in Sweden for having sex without a condom, I realized that we don’t have a condom for those people who enjoy the thrill of the leak but must wear a condom to meet local ordinances,” said Adam Glickman, President and CEO of Condomania. “Here’s a guy that clearly enjoys the danger of leaking, but didn’t have a condom that leaked. If DickiLeak condoms were available at that time, Assange would have been legally protected even if he wasn’t sexually protected.

For who’s interested in using this gadget: DickiLeak condoms are available for $11.95 per dozen from Condomania.com.

Wikileaks Condom – Dickileaks by Condomania

Wikileaks Condom – Dickileaks by Condomania

January 20, 2011

AWESOME PHOTOS: Amy Poehler’s Secret Modeling Past!

Filed under: Julian Assange - Wikileaks — Tags: , , , — Mal @ 8:00 pm

2

@taboy: I’m not sure what you’re getting at, but if you’ll excuse the shorthand of a Jon Stewart video, you’ll see that at least a week before the Olbermann piece, two personalities from Fox invoked the “sex by surprise” and the broken condom story. I’ve never faulted either of them for discussing the story as it was originally reported, or the way they were analyzed by the Feministe blog in the link Tommy provided, or using the language that my wife and I used, when the story first broke.

(I’ve also never really harped on the idea that most of the bloggers associated with the #MooreandMe campaign mistakenly believed that charges had been filed, so they had to update several of their posts to reflect the reality of the situation)

Personally, I haven’t heard from the alleged victims and I agree with Moore that the timing seems suspicious, but if a crime was committed, I’m sure the courts will provide justice.

And while I’m not a fan of Olbermann or Assange as a person, I think it’s a bit unfair for the bloggers to insist that he stay in jail because he can’t afford bond, not only because I believe in justice and the rights of the poor, but because Wikileaks is in the middle of a huge document dump that couldn’t be properly publicized from jail.

So again, I don’t see your point. It seems to me that everyone has been misinformed on the topic from Day One and until this comment, I’ve never said a word about the similar analysis that came from Fox. And for the record, a lot has taken place over the past week, so I don’t think that in the scheme of things, a thirty second exchange on MSNBC is really that important.

AWESOME PHOTOS: Amy Poehler’s Secret Modeling Past!

January 2, 2011

Keith Olbermann, Michael Moore, Julian Assange, and rape: Fun with ‘frenzy’

Filed under: Julian Assange - Wikileaks — Tags: , , — Mal @ 11:00 pm

Image Credit: Frederick M. Brown/Getty ImagesOn Countdown with Keith Olbermann on Tuesday, Michael Moore mischaracterized the rape accusations facing Julian Assange. People criticized both him and Olbermann, and now the MSNBC host has quit Twitter in a huff, thanks to what he described as a “frenzy.” Yep, it’s almost like misrepresenting and minimizing rape accusations can get people upset. Feminists — we’re impossible to please.

Moore, who posted $20,000 towards Assange’s bail, described the inquiry as “stink[ing] to the high heavens.” Moore suggested that governments and corporations are going after Assange with “smears,” and then said that the “charge is that his condom broke during consensual sex.” Check out the clip below and scroll to the 13:10 mark for Moore’s remarks.

This is not true. It’s just not. from The Guardian:

The first complainant, a miss a, said she was the victim of “unlawful coercion” on the night of 14 August in Stockholm. The court heard Assange was alleged to have “forcefully” held her arms and used his bodyweight to hold her down. The second charge alleged he “sexually molested” her by having sex without using a condom, when it was her “express wish” that one should be used.a third charge claimed Assange “deliberately molested” miss a on 18 August.a fourth charge, relating to a miss W, alleged that on 17 August, he “improperly exploited” the fact she was asleep to have sex with her without a condom.

Michael Moore was wrong, and Keith Olbermann didn’t correct him, and now Keith Olbermann is mad that people are calling him out. The #MooreandMe tag starting blowing up on Twitter after Sady Doyle wrote a scathing reaction to Moore’s appearance (btw, if you’re not reading Tiger Beatdown on the regular, you’re missing out) — and then Keith Olbermann responded by blocking Doyle and others who agreed with her. he then posted a five-part Twitter non-apology apology, sent some angry @replies, and wrote “I’ll thus unblock all blocks, wish you all a Merry Christmas and I’ll suspend this account until/if this frenzy is stopped.” (He broke the moratorium a few hours later to tweet Larry King.)

Look, if we’re going to talk about Twitter and feminism, we should turn to one of the Internet’s great treasures, Feminist Hulk, whose sage wisdom on such matters is always welcome. ( A classic: “HULK TRY TO BE MINDFUL WHEN COMPLICIT IN SYSTEMS OF PRIVILEGE. SMASH HEGEMONY, WHETHER IT “BENEFIT” HULK OR OPPRESS HIM!”) And on this front, he’s got it exactly right: “AS SURVIVOR, HULK DISTURBED BY ASSANGE COVERAGE. HULK GLAD WIKILEAKS EXIST. HULK SMASH RAPE SHAME. AT SAME TIME.”

Dead on as usual, Feminist Hulk.

I’ve seen Rosemary’s Baby, but I still think drugging and raping a 13-year-old is wrong. I can believe that a radically honest and open government is better for everyone, and I can still think that people who hold women down and forceably have sex with them against their will should go to prison. And you can even be a bleeding heart, pro-union pinko liberal like me and still know that Keith Olbermann and Michael Moore got this really, really wrong.

For more on the differences between Swedish and U.S. laws regarding sexual assault, read this Salon article. for another breakdown of the Olbermann timeline, read this Washington Post story. for more about why “talking about Julian Assange has become utterly terrible,” read this Jezebel post.

Keith Olbermann, Michael Moore, Julian Assange, and rape: Fun with ‘frenzy’

Keith Olbermann, Michael Moore, Julian Assange, and rape: Fun with ‘frenzy’

January 1, 2011

Keith Olbermann, Michael Moore, Julian Assange, and rape: Fun with ‘frenzy’

Filed under: Julian Assange - Wikileaks — Tags: , , , , , — Mal @ 1:00 am

Image Credit: Frederick M. Brown/Getty ImagesOn Countdown with Keith Olbermann on Tuesday, Michael Moore mischaracterized the rape accusations facing Julian Assange. People criticized both him and Olbermann, and now the MSNBC host has quit Twitter in a huff, thanks to what he described as a “frenzy.” Yep, it’s almost like misrepresenting and minimizing rape accusations can get people upset. Feminists — we’re impossible to please.

Moore, who posted $20,000 towards Assange’s bail, described the inquiry as “stink[ing] to the high heavens.” Moore suggested that governments and corporations are going after Assange with “smears,” and then said that the “charge is that his condom broke during consensual sex.” Check out the clip below and scroll to the 13:10 mark for Moore’s remarks.

This is not true. It’s just not. From The Guardian:

The first complainant, a Miss a, said she was the victim of “unlawful coercion” on the night of 14 August in Stockholm. The court heard Assange was alleged to have “forcefully” held her arms and used his bodyweight to hold her down. The second charge alleged he “sexually molested” her by having sex without using a condom, when it was her “express wish” that one should be used.a third charge claimed Assange “deliberately molested” Miss a on 18 August.a fourth charge, relating to a Miss W, alleged that on 17 August, he “improperly exploited” the fact she was asleep to have sex with her without a condom.

Michael Moore was wrong, and Keith Olbermann didn’t correct him, and now Keith Olbermann is mad that people are calling him out. The #MooreandMe tag starting blowing up on Twitter after Sady Doyle wrote a scathing reaction to Moore’s appearance (btw, if you’re not reading Tiger Beatdown on the regular, you’re missing out) — and then Keith Olbermann responded by blocking Doyle and others who agreed with her. he then posted a five-part Twitter non-apology apology, sent some angry @replies, and wrote “I’ll thus unblock all blocks, wish you all a Merry Christmas and I’ll suspend this account until/if this frenzy is stopped.” (He broke the moratorium a few hours later to tweet Larry King.)

Look, if we’re going to talk about Twitter and feminism, we should turn to one of the Internet’s great treasures, Feminist Hulk, whose sage wisdom on such matters is always welcome. ( A classic: “HULK TRY TO BE MINDFUL WHEN COMPLICIT IN SYSTEMS OF PRIVILEGE. SMASH HEGEMONY, WHETHER IT “BENEFIT” HULK OR OPPRESS HIM!”) And on this front, he’s got it exactly right: “AS SURVIVOR, HULK DISTURBED BY ASSANGE COVERAGE. HULK GLAD WIKILEAKS EXIST. HULK SMASH RAPE SHAME. AT SAME TIME.”

Dead on as usual, Feminist Hulk.

I’ve seen Rosemary’s Baby, but I still think drugging and raping a 13-year-old is wrong. I can believe that a radically honest and open government is better for everyone, and I can still think that people who hold women down and forceably have sex with them against their will should go to prison. And you can even be a bleeding heart, pro-union pinko liberal like me and still know that Keith Olbermann and Michael Moore got this really, really wrong.

For more on the differences between Swedish and U.S. laws regarding sexual assault, read this Salon article. for another breakdown of the Olbermann timeline, read this Washington Post story. for more about why “talking about Julian Assange has become utterly terrible,” read this Jezebel post.

Keith Olbermann, Michael Moore, Julian Assange, and rape: Fun with ‘frenzy’

December 30, 2010

PHOTOS: The Best Dressed Newscasters of 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — Mal @ 8:00 pm

2

@taboy: I’m not sure what you’re getting at, but if you’ll excuse the shorthand of a Jon Stewart video, you’ll see that at least a week before the Olbermann piece, two personalities from Fox invoked the “sex by surprise” and the broken condom story. I’ve never faulted either of them for discussing the story as it was originally reported, or the way they were analyzed by the Feministe blog in the link Tommy provided, or using the language that my wife and I used, when the story first broke.

(I’ve also never really harped on the idea that most of the bloggers associated with the #MooreandMe campaign mistakenly believed that charges had been filed, so they had to update several of their posts to reflect the reality of the situation)

Personally, I haven’t heard from the alleged victims and I agree with Moore that the timing seems suspicious, but if a crime was committed, I’m sure the courts will provide justice.

And while I’m not a fan of Olbermann or Assange as a person, I think it’s a bit unfair for the bloggers to insist that he stay in jail because he can’t afford bond, not only because I believe in justice and the rights of the poor, but because Wikileaks is in the middle of a huge document dump that couldn’t be properly publicized from jail.

So again, I don’t see your point. It seems to me that everyone has been misinformed on the topic from Day One and until this comment, I’ve never said a word about the similar analysis that came from Fox. and for the record, a lot has taken place over the past week, so I don’t think that in the scheme of things, a thirty second exchange on MSNBC is really that important.

PHOTOS: The Best Dressed Newscasters of 2010

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress