.

Western Outlaw

April 22, 2011

WikiLeaks suspect transferred to Fort Leavenworth

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — Mal @ 3:30 am

By LOLITA C. BALDOR and ROBERT BURNSAssociated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) – The Army private suspected of illegally passing U.S. government secrets to the WikiLeaks website was transferred Wednesday to an Army prison in Kansas from the Marine brig in Virginia where he has spent the past nine months.

Pfc. Bradley Manning, suspected of having obtained the classified documents while serving as an Army intelligence analyst in Iraq, is awaiting a determination by the Army on whether he is mentally competent to stand trial.

An Army spokesman at the Pentagon, Col. Tom Collins, said Manning arrived safely at the Joint Regional Correctional Facility at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., on Wednesday afternoon. over the coming five to seven days he will undergo an in-depth physical and behavioral assessment by Leavenworth staff, Collins said.

Shortly after the Pentagon announced its decision to transfer Manning, the soldier's lawyer, David Coombs, wrote on his blog that his client's treatment at Quantico was substandard.

“While the defense hopes that the move to Fort Leavenworth will result in the improvement of Pfc. Manning's conditions of confinement, it nonetheless intends to pursue redress at the appropriate time for the flagrant violations of his constitutional rights by the Quantico confinement facility,” Coombs wrote.

The Pentagon said Manning would be returned to the Washington, D.C., area as needed for legal proceedings, since his case is under the jurisdiction of the Army's Military District of Washington. no trial date has been set.

Jeh Johnson, the Pentagon's top lawyer, said the transfer to Fort Leavenworth does not suggest that Manning's treatment at the Marine base at Quantico, Va., was inappropriate. But he acknowledged that the case received high-level Pentagon attention because of persistent criticism by human rights groups, some members of Congress and others of the conditions in which Manning had been held.

Johnson, however, told reporters at a hastily arrangement news conference on Tuesday, “The fact that we have made a decision to transfer this particular pretrial confine … should not be interpreted as a criticism of the place he was before.”

Army Undersecretary Joseph Westphal, speaking at the same news conference, acknowledged that the brig at Quantico was not designed to hold pretrial detainees for more than a few months.

“We were looking at a situation where he would need an environment more conducive for a longer detention,” Westphal said.

The new facility has more space, and Manning will have a greater opportunity to eat and interact with other prisoners there, officials said. there also is a larger staff of trained mental, emotional and physical health specialists.

Lt. Col. Dawn Hilton, who is in charge of the medium-security detention facility at Leavenworth, said Manning will undergo a comprehensive evaluation there to assess whether he is a risk to his own or others' safety. The 150 inmates at the facility – including eight who are awaiting trial – are allowed three hours of recreation a day, she said, and three meals a day in a dining area.

She said the facility, which opened for pre-trial detainees in January, is designed for long-term detention. Officials say Manning's case, which involves hundreds of thousands of highly sensitive and classified documents, is complex and could drag on for months, if not years.

Manning faces nearly two dozen charges, including aiding the enemy, a crime that can bring the death penalty or life in prison.

His transfer to Leavenworth comes a bit more than a week after a U.N. torture investigator complained that he was denied a request to make an unmonitored visit to Manning. Pentagon officials said he could meet with Manning, but it is customary to give only the detainee's lawyer confidential visits.

The U.N. official, Juan Mendez, said a monitored conversation would be counter to the practice of his U.N. mandate.

A few days later, a committee of Germany's parliament protested about Manning's treatment to the White House. and Amnesty International has said Manning's treatment may violate his human rights.

Tom Parker, a policy director at Amnesty International, said, “The conditions that he was reported to be held in at Quantico were extremely harsh and could have damaged his mental health.”

President Barack Obama and senior military officials have repeatedly contended that Manning is being held under appropriate conditions given the seriousness of the charges against him.

He is accused of leaking hundreds of thousands of documents to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks, including Iraq and Afghanistan war logs, confidential State Department cables and a classified military video of a 2007 Apache helicopter attack in Iraq that killed a Reuters news photographer and his driver.

Joint Regional Correctional Facility: www.army.mil/jrcf

Copyright 2011 The associated Press. all rights reserved. this material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

WikiLeaks suspect transferred to Fort Leavenworth

April 7, 2011

WikiLeaks founder arrested in London, threatens to release most sensitive documents

The 39-year-old Australian, Julian Paul Assange, founder of the controversial Internet website WikiLeaks was arrested by British police authorities on the strength of a European warrant of arrest. Assange was accused by Swedish authorities with one count of rape, two counts of sexual molestation, and one count of unlawful coercion which were allegedly committed sometime in August 2010.

Assange vehemently denied these accusations, said Mark Stephens, his London-based lawyer, alleging that the case was stemmed from a dispute over consensual but unprotected sex with two women. One of the women was quoted as saying that it was indeed a consensual sex but it all ended with abuse. she denied the claims of Assange’s lawyers that the case was orchestrated by the Pentagon.

Stephens on the other hand accused that the case lodged by the Swedish government was orchestrated by Pentagon who he believes is the “unseen hand” trying to pin down his client purposely as a repressive move to contain further leaking of U.S. sensitive documents that had been perceived will affect the national security interest of the United States.

Another London-based lawyer of Assange, Jennifer Robinson, said that her client would likely resist extradition move by the Swedish authorities because she believes he would be turned over to the U.S. government who had been outraged because of the recent publication of the so-called sensitive documents through the Internet.

On the other hand, Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard was disheartened by the action of one of her constituent saying that the posting on the web of the U.S. diplomatic cables was grossly an irresponsible action. she underscored that the publication of the said classified documents would not have been possible if there was no illegal act committed by Assange.

The Wikileaks founder responded in a written opinion published by an Australian newspaper by saying that her government is trying to stop him from leaking the documents because it doesn’t like him to reveal the truth. he blamed the Australian government that it has no interest of defending him and other WikiLeaks personnel against the many public threats of violence. he expected that the Australian government would be defending one of her citizens but it all boiled down to a wholly unsubstantiated accusation of illegality.

Meanwhile, the U.S. government is now putting intense pressure on WikiLeaks and to those people helping it by presently conducting intensive investigations to determine the culpability of Assange and his associates of possible prosecution under the U.S. Espionage Law.

It was reported also that the website is now under heightened hackers’ attack and struggling to stay online amid pressure from world governments. It has been receiving assistance from computer-savvy advocates by setting up hundreds of the same kind of websites all over the world.

Meantime, Assange warned that when arrest will be effected on WikiLeaks staff, the heavily encrypted version of his most important documents will be instantly made public.

Share and Enjoy:

WikiLeaks founder arrested in London, threatens to release most sensitive documents

February 25, 2011

What do you think will happen with the WikiLeaks news break tomorrow?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , — Mal @ 11:00 am

Supposedly it's going to be super scandalous and the Pentagon is worried. Honestly, I'm hoping WikiLeaks pulls through, I feel US citizens deserve to know these things. What does everyone think? will it happen or will the government stop it before tomorrow morning?

I don't get it…

What do you think will happen with the WikiLeaks news break tomorrow?

January 20, 2011

Why are people attacking Wikileaks, when it's the individuals that leaked the information who broke the law?

I mean, under the theory that Wikileaks is breaking the law, wouldn't the Washington Post have broken the law with Watergate & the new York Times with the Pentagon Papers? They're doing the same thing.

analogy :why are human traffickers being arrested when its the under age immigrants being the prostitutes?

Why are people attacking Wikileaks, when it's the individuals that leaked the information who broke the law?

January 14, 2011

U.S. Military Assures U.N. WikiLeaks Suspect Treated 'Fairly' – FoxNews.com

Filed under: Julian Assange - Wikileaks — Tags: , , — Mal @ 4:00 am

The U.S. military told the United Nations on Wednesday that it had nothing to worry about after the world body agreed to look into a complaint about prison conditions for the Army private suspected of dishing secret military and diplomatic computer files to WikiLeaks. 

A spokesman for Quantico Marine Corps Base, where Pfc. Bradley Manning is being held, told FoxNews.com that U.N. intervention in the case would be unusual. 

“I’ve never heard of the U.N. coming in to inspect a brig or confinement facility,” Villiard said, “The Marines that are working at the brig are extremely professional. … They’ve been doing this for awhile.” 

Villiard said Manning is being treated “fairly” and his conditions are being monitored by U.S. officials. 

“We’ve been reviewed … No concerns have been voiced from a (Department of Defense) perspective,” Villiard said. 

The State Department had no comment on the U.N.’s decision to consider the complaint, and the office of U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice referred all questions on Manning to the Pentagon. 

The associated Press reported Wednesday that the U.N.’s Geneva office for torture issues was looking into mistreatment complaints filed by supporters of Manning — the prime suspect in what is believed to be one of the most blatant acts of treason against the United States. 

Gary Tallman, with the Army media relations office at the Pentagon, said the U.N. action “does not necessarily constitute an investigation” at this point. 

“The Army is aware of the reports of this,” Tallman said in an e-mail. “We don’t have an additional comment.”

Urged on by his attorney, David Coombs, Manning supporters have been waging an online campaign claiming the Army private’s prison conditions are inhumane, charges the military says are baseless. Villiard said Manning is treated the same as every other maximum-custody detainee in the brig. 

“It’s not the Shangri-La,” Villiard said, but other prisoners in the wing receive the same treatment.

<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/22/military-pushes-agrees-review-wikileaks-suspects-treatment-308050226/?test=latestnewstag:news.google.com,2005:cluster=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/22/military-pushes-agrees-review-wikileaks-suspects-treatment-308050226/?test=latestnewsWed, 22 Dec 2010 23:07:52 GMT 00:00″>U.S. Military Assures U.N. WikiLeaks Suspect Treated 'Fairly' – FoxNews.com

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress